This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sander Steffann
sander at steffann.nl
Tue Jul 19 11:40:09 CEST 2011
Hi, > On 7/19/11 11:16 AM, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote: >> I think we will keep having having these issues until the minimum subnet >> assignment (outside point to point links) can be smaller than /64 which >> is an astronomical waste of public addresses for a home or business >> assignment. > > Maybe it's me, but I really don't understand what are you talking about. > Can you please elaborate a bit on this? Please take this off-list as this is out of scope for RIPE. Thanks :) Sander
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] RE: [ipv6-wg] additional IPv6 allocation (ripe-512 issues)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]