This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Adrian Czapek
adrian.czapek at rybnet.pl
Sat Jul 2 13:56:18 CEST 2011
W dniu 2011-07-02 12:25, Nick Hilliard pisze: > On 02/07/2011 08:35, Masataka Ohta wrote: >> IETF can do nothing unless ISPs of RIPE and other RIRs accept >> the restriction that only very large ISPs can have their own >> global routing table entries and address spaces of other ISPs >> must be delegated from those of the very large ISPs. > > Why not put forward a proposal to the APWG along these lines then? > Who will be the one to define "very large" ? -- Adrian
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]