[address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth

Sander Steffann wrote:

> Getting a good solution for this is _very_ important to limit
> routing table growth. Many people/organizations probably
> don't want the hassle of BGP if they can get more redundancy
> and less dependencies on a single ISP (easier renumbering
> will help too) in a simpler way. But this is IETF territory,
> not RIPE :-)

IETF can do nothing unless ISPs of RIPE and other RIRs accept
the restriction that only very large ISPs can have their own
global routing table entries and address spaces of other ISPs
must be delegated from those of the very large ISPs.

Is it time to ressurect RFC2374?

						Masataka Ohta