This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dan Luedtke
danrl.mailinglists at googlemail.com
Fri Jul 1 18:14:25 CEST 2011
Dear Community, I can't wait for this change to happen. As I discussed at IPv6 Kongress in Frankfurt, Germany, there are more than a handful of people wanting that change. For example, I have an IPv4 PI network and adopted early to IPv6 using an IPv6 PA network. Never did, nor will I ever understand why multihoming is required for an IPv6 PI network but not for an IPv4 PI network. I support this draft and like to thank everyone who made it happen. This is an important step awaited by me and many others, even if the community decides not to do it. best regards, Dan Luedtke -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110701/2dcfa138/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]