This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andrei Robachevsky
andrei.robachevsky at gmail.com
Fri Jul 1 13:51:25 CEST 2011
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Shane Kerr wrote on 29/06/2011 21:04: [...] > My further understanding is that desire for PI is mostly for > non-technical reasons. I don't think anything can make this motivation > go away. Companies want it. > PI also has non-technical implications. In terms of the maintenance fee, accountability, etc. So far it has been a loophole letting you to get a chunk bigger that the minimum allocation size for a fixed Eur50 (+your friendly LIR overhead) per year. But hopefully this can be fixed outside this policy proposal. Andrei -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAk4NtL0ACgkQljz5tZmtij/78ACglSCfJWLmlw+BXCSmnrLe7ElS QW0AmJsPEEld+8H1iM5Zo6rzIrDMZLw= =QzBb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Source of routing table growth
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Draft Document Published (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6 PI)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]