[ipv6-wg] RE: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Gert Doering wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:48:05PM +0200, Ahmed Abu-Abed wrote:
>> I am new to the Address Policy WG and this seems like quite an old discussion. I endorse assigning a /32 to LIRs regardless of the IPv6 access method they use.
>
> Uh, what exactly are we discussing here?
>
> Just to make this very clear:
>
>    Any RIPE LIR can get a /32 IPv6 PA right away, just by asking.
>
> Only if you want *multiple* /32, or "bigger than a /32", this is where
> it gets tricky (multiple distinct /32s are not possible under the
> current policy, "bigger than a /32" needs documentation that you have
> the necessary amount of customers).
>
> Gert Doering
>        -- APWG chair

Yes Agreed. I am against the idea, that 6RD deployment automatically 
grant another /32 allocation.

 	Best Regards,
 			Janos