[ipv6-wg] RE: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 allocations for 6RD

Hi

We would like to weigh in here.
We feel that it should be RIPEs policy to allocate ONE /32 to any LIR 
who requests it for 6rd.

6rd is the only way for us to reach all our residential customers. 
Especially those in Municipal Networks that are very slow to invest in 
their networks and often do not have the competence and time to 
impelment IPv6.

Also, Cisco has not yet implemented even a small part of the protective 
mechanisms we rely on in IPv4 to secure our residential networks. Many 
of these features are required to meet the demands contracted with the 
customers. We cannot use native IPv6 until Cisco implements these 
features and we have tested and rolled them out on hundreds of switches.

6rd bypasses all these issues. IF we can get a /32 for that purpuse.

-- 

Med Vänliga Hälsningar - Best regards
Mattias Gyllenvarg
Network Operations Center
Bredband2

---------------------- end of line ---------------------------