This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Shane Kerr
shane at time-travellers.org
Tue Feb 15 13:01:15 CET 2011
Daniel, On Tue, 2011-02-15 at 10:47 +0100, Daniel Roesen wrote: > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 10:14:41AM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote: > > * ULA addresses, with random addresses > > Doesn't work for hybrids unless NAT is used for the (potentially > single-homed) Internet connection. Didn't we want to avoid NAT? I'm not sure what you mean by "hybrid". Can you explain or give a reference to what you mean? If you mean a site that needs both internal-only and externally-visible addresses, then with IPv6 I think the simple answer is to use ULA for the internal addresses, and PA space for the external addresses. All IPv6 devices can handle multiple addresses. > > * 6to4 addresses, using one or more of your IPv4 addresses > > "What IPv4 addresses?" :-) Funny, but you only need a /32 for most purposes here, since each IPv4 /32 becomes a /48 under 2002::/16. It's not for everyone, but if you have even a single IPv4 address you can use this for your internal network numbering. Unless you need more than a /48, in which case are you sure you don't want to multihome? :-P -- Shane
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Re: IPv6 PI resource question!
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]