This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Mon Dec 12 10:59:19 CET 2011
On 12/12/11 10:49 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > if you think this is delaying ipv6 adoption then you are utterly blind. > > for my opinion on what delayed ipv6 adoption see > > <https://archive.psg.com/111116.intarea-vision.pdf> this seems very familiar and I agree (as you might suspect) :) But "constraining the distribution of IPv6 resources" is not helping either... As you once said "give me the tool to deal with idiots that deaggregate" - this might be also the case in IPv6 and PI without multihoming will not be the only reason. Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]