This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jan Zorz @ go6.si
jan at go6.si
Mon Dec 12 10:25:07 CET 2011
On 12/12/11 10:03 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >> So you are effectively saying, that we are constraining the IPv6 >> address distribution because of "man in a carriage"? > > horseshit > > he is saying that we have long experience of what causes routing table > bloat and that we are about to repeat a mistake we made once already. I agree, that not distributing the IPv6 space can prevent routing table bloat, but is this really the right way? can't we deal with that in any other way other than delaying IPv6 adoption? Cheers, Jan
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]