This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Sat Dec 10 07:33:10 CET 2011
Hello, I am glad to see that I am not alone. However, I am still worried that several people voted for a free beer. OK, free beer is nice if somebody is ready to pay it ;-(), but this case is a different one. The problem is that the limits of the technology can not be changed by voting and concensus declaration. AND the whole policy addresses global issues. The policy proposal was a very bad message for other regions. Liberty to pollut (in this case: the global routing table) is not a liberty for me. Thanks, Géza On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 7:02 AM, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote: > > I would certainly hope that these objections will not be ignored > > but considered addressed. > > the concerns (which careful reading of the thread would show that i > shared with geza) were not 'addressed' in the sense of overcome. > randy > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20111210/c7d3d710/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]