This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Fri Dec 9 15:28:56 CET 2011
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 10:12:34PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote: > So the AP WG chairs have decided (after long discussion) that we do > have rough consensus on this policy proposal, and the remaining > objections will be ignored. I would certainly hope that these objections will not be ignored but considered addressed. The important difference being that they have been taken seriously based on their own merits and found to be outweighed by the counter arguments (and/or there was no way to compromise). That's a judgement to be made and you've made it. In this case let me say, one could also reasonably come to a different conclusion. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]