This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] consensus and 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Fri Dec 9 11:49:01 CET 2011
On 09/12/2011 09:47, Immo 'FaUl' Wehrenberg wrote: > I personally am not sure wether we have "group solidarity of belief or > sentiment" here, and I don't think we can declare it without Geza agreeing. > > To be clear here: that does not meen that Geza must agree on the proposal > or withdraw his objections. I only ask wether he considers the groups belief > and sentiment on accepting the proposal solidary. Immo, You're arguing that the person who shouts loudest should have a veto. This is not consensus, and is not how APWG operates. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] consensus and 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]