This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] defining consensus
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] defining consensus
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
DI. Thomas Schallar
t.schallar at avalon.at
Fri Dec 9 11:22:11 CET 2011
Jim Reid schrieb am 09.12.2011 10:31: > Incidentally, consensus in a WG is whatever its chairs decide is > consensus. That's why they're there. :-) And why there are further > steps in the PDP to check that decision. If a small number object to a > proposal that otherwise has overwhelming support, the WG chairs can > quite reasonably declare consensus on that proposal. I totally support that!!! :-) You may never ever get 100.0% agreement for /any/ decision. Nevertheless, a decision has to be made eventually. That's one big problem in democracy and there's no solution to that. Thomas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20111209/e0101f36/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] defining consensus
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]