This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] status of 2011-02
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] consensus and 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] defining consensus
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sascha Lenz
slz at baycix.de
Fri Dec 9 10:16:28 CET 2011
Hi, > Gert Doering wrote: >> - but the *working group* has the last word on any policy decision, >> so we call for two weeks of "Last Call" on this decision > > As much as I like to see this policy change implemented and as much as > I disagree with Geza, technically if someone is opposing (and I think all > would agree that it was not trolling), then that is technically not an > consensus. > > However, I'd like to hear Gezas opinion on wether rough consensus has been > reached and would subscribe to his view on that. the PDP calls for rough consensus, not for unanimous consensus. There's a difference, check Randy's link or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consensus#Near-unanimous_consensus -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind Regards Sascha Lenz [SLZ-RIPE] Senior System- & Network Architect
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] consensus and 2011-02
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] defining consensus
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]