This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Alex Le Heux
alexlh at ripe.net
Wed Aug 17 15:01:03 CEST 2011
Dear Wilfried, On Aug 10, 2011, at 12:23, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote: > Without wanting to imply anything, just providing us with real figures - > > iirc NCC Registration Services has given a very nice report recently (at 61 > or 62? a recent NRO report?), listing the number of PI assignmenet vs the number > of PA allocations, and the percentage of space given out for the 2 categories. > > Unfortunately, I cannot find this/those presentation/s on short notice right now. > Maybe the NCC can help? At RIPE62 I presented the following: http://ripe62.ripe.net/presentations/209-apwg.pdf (PI section starts at slide 9, numbers from 25 onwards) Adding the IPv4 PI vs the IPv4 ALLOCATED blocks the RIPE NCC has on file at the moment, we see that 3.5% of all IPv4 IPs handed out were assigned/allocated as PI. Best regards, Alex Le Heux
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]