[address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?

On 10 Aug 2011, at 11:33, Jasper Jans wrote:

>  If we really have to do the dual-homing
> requirement (I'm of the opinion we don't) then at the very least make it so that the clause states
> that you need to be dual-homed for any new IPv6 PI, or must already own IPv4 PI. This way you can
> prevent people from getting it that do not have it yet but allow the ones that already run IPv4 PI to
> get IPv6 PI.

I would be wary of policies that provide advantages to incumbents (people who already have IPv4 or can get it in the next few months) over newcomers. IP networks used to be on the newcomers side and I kindly request those who remember to remind themselves what they thought of the incumbents (not to mention what other parties in charge of "fairness" might think)

Joao