[address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?

On 10 August 2011 10:33, Jasper Jans <Jasper.Jans at espritxb.nl> wrote:
> I am all for learning from our mistakes - but we cannot deploy policy that excludes a group of people
> when it comes to IPv6 that already qualified for ipv4 PI. If we really have to do the dual-homing
> requirement (I'm of the opinion we don't) then at the very least make it so that the clause states
> that you need to be dual-homed for any new IPv6 PI, or must already own IPv4 PI. This way you can
> prevent people from getting it that do not have it yet but allow the ones that already run IPv4 PI to
> get IPv6 PI.

That would be an option, adding the requirement for Dual Homing or
existing IPv4 PI would seem to solve the issue - it might even
increase the number of v4 PI requests and speed depletion which some
would see as a good thing.

J
-- 

James Blessing
07989 039 476