This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Turchanyi Geza
turchanyi.geza at gmail.com
Wed Aug 10 11:56:56 CEST 2011
Hi Jasper, On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Jasper Jans <Jasper.Jans at espritxb.nl>wrote: > I am all for learning from our mistakes - but we cannot deploy policy that > excludes a group of people > when it comes to IPv6 that already qualified for ipv4 PI. If we really have > to do the dual-homing > requirement (I'm of the opinion we don't) > then at the very least make it so that the clause states > that you need to be dual-homed for any new IPv6 PI, or must already own > IPv4 PI. This way you can > prevent people from getting it that do not have it yet but allow the ones > that already run IPv4 PI to > get IPv6 PI. > > Jasper > This is an argument what many people might support -- even me ;-) , --- but I would also add some review period to all PI allocations. Like this: The policy allowing Provider Independent allocation might be revoked later on and if it is revoked then ALL PI holder not fullfilling the new policy will be requested to return their PI address space and renumber to PA address space within 2 years. What do you think about this? Thanks, Géza -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20110810/9c2c7ac2/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]