[address-policy-wg] PI for IPv6 == PI for IPv4?

Hi Jim,

without a direct replay to your last message,

let me explain why I am in favour of 2011-02.

Jim Reid wrote:
[...]
> I'm neither for or against 2011-02: just trying to better understand 
> the rationale and motivation behind it.

I am in contact with organisations who want (or are pushed :-) ) to deploy
IPv6. Some of them have a very credible reason to use PI addresses, although
they do not configure dual-homing *for IPv6* for the very beginning. Still,
using PA is a bad choice for them.

Possible reactions to this have either been becoming an LIR (potentially a
waste of address space, plus additional cost, but option has been selected),
or to delay the introduction of IPv6 for the moment; has been done, too :-)

Hth,
Wilfried.