[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?

Hi Paul,

That is indeed a very common setup and removing the multi-home requirement for v6 will allow us to do the same for those PI customers.

Erik

Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad

Op Aug 8, 2011 om 11:06 heeft "Paul Hoogsteder" <paul at meanie.nl> het volgende geschreven:

>> On 8/8/11 10:36 AM, DI. Thomas Schallar wrote:
>>> To have our IPv6 space be explicitly multihomed, we have to
>>> 
>>> * apply for an AS for proper BGP announcement
>>> * change fom cheap Internet uplink to expensive transit
>> 
>> that does not change with removing the multihoming requirement. PI is
>> still PI and you need to announce it via BGP and your ASN.
> 
> Why? We (as a multihomed ISP) announce both our own PA blocks and one of
> our customers PI block in v4 - why wouldn't that work/be allowed in v6?
> There's no need for an ASN or BGP capable router at the customer.
> 
> Paul.
>