[address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?

I support this proposal.

-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net [mailto:address-policy-wg-admin at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Erik Bais
Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 12:43 PM
To: 'DI. Thomas Schallar'; 'RIPE Address Policy Working Group'
Cc: jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] Status of 2011-02 Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)?

Hi Thomas,

A quick update on the status of 2011-02 policy.

I spoke with the AP-WG-chair last week and the decision is that there will
be an extended review period to give people the time to ask questions if
needed on the proposal.

So to everyone on the list, let's hear it.

I've done a presentation on RIPE62 on the proposal for those not familiar
with 2011-02 and you can find the PPT here :
http://ripe62.ripe.net/presentations/171-2011-02_ripe62.ppt

You can read the policy proposal itself here:
http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2011-02

In short, the policy proposal is to remove the multi-homing requirement for
PI IPv6.
Currently, companies can become a LIR and get IPv6, with no multi-home
requirement, same with requesting IPv4 PI.
And companies that don't want to or (legally) can't become a LIR but do want
to have their own IPv6 addresses are required to be multi-homed.

The only change in text in the RIPE-512 is:

Remove the line:

a) demonstrate that it will be multihomed

For those that agree with the policy and everything is clear, express your
support on the AP-WG-mailing list your support.

Kind regards,
Erik Bais
Co-author of 2011-02




Op dit e-mailbericht is een disclaimer van toepassing, welke te vinden is op http://www.espritxb.nl/disclaimer