This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Florian Weimer
fweimer at bfk.de
Thu Apr 21 16:09:29 CEST 2011
* Mikael Abrahamsson: > On Thu, 21 Apr 2011, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> * Mikael Abrahamsson: >> >>> I don't want the money, I just want there to be *substantial cost* to >>> take up a DFZ slot. >> >> And degrade overall routing quality because networks cannot afford >> announcing shorter paths? I don't think this is a good idea. > > Please elaborate. I don't understand your reasoning. How does > de-aggregation improve routing quality? It can make it possible for your network to choose a better path to the destination, even according to your own set of cost metrics. -- Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de> BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/ Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1 D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2011-02 New Policy Proposal (Removal of multihomed requirement for IPv6)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]