[address-policy-wg] Suggested updates to 2010-05 (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)

On 19/09/2010 19:12, Chris Grundemann wrote:
> Problem #1: The allocation method was unfair.

"Fairness" is a remarkably mercurial concept which has little or no meaning
in an environment of plenty.  It's much easier to talk about "unfairness":
which is the state of mind of candidate A, when candidate B receives
preferential treatment.  Just look at squabbling children and their
exquisitely honed sense of personal injustice.

I would suggest that - regardless of the rules set up now - there will be a
lot of "unfairness" and "injustice" of this sort once address space
exhaustion hits.

Nick