[address-policy-wg] 2010-06 New Policy Proposal (Registration Requirements for IPv6 End User Assignments): discussion in the IPv6-WG mailing list

On 01/09/2010 15:21, Emilio Madaio wrote:
> A new policy proposal, 2010-06, "Registration Requirements for IPv6 End
> User Assignments", was published to the IPv6 Working Group mailing list today.

I think I like this policy, mostly.

The only issue I have is that it appears to mandate that all assignments 
makes from a SUB-ASSIGNED PA block are exactly the length specified.  This 
means that if the ISP has policies of, say,  /56 for most customers but /48 
for some, while at the same time wanting to implement some form of per-PoP 
prefix aggregation, it means assigning multiple blocks per aggregation 
point, one per assignment size.

Is this intentional?

Nick