This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Per Heldal
heldal at eml.cc
Sat Oct 30 01:31:03 CEST 2010
On Fri, 2010-10-29 at 17:27 -0400, Milton L Mueller wrote: > > > > > Question 2: why wouldn't LIR 1 form a new company and call it a > > startup to get privileged access to addresses? Or, might LIR 3, LIR 1's > > long standing competitor, form a new LIR to gain an advantage in the > > competition for resources? > > > > > Most, if not all, networks of significant size have a small > > chunk of spare addresses they can recycle for transition services. A > > new LIR OTOH has nothing and could theoretically be blocked from entering > > the market. > > And Question 2? That's best answered with a question. What's the point for an established LIR to go through all that trouble just to get another tiny block? A small hosting-operation might have some use for it, but it makes no sense for your example LIR (regional, national or multi-national network operator). //per
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-2
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]