This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[eix-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Policy Proposal (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
- Previous message (by thread): [eix-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Policy Proposal (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
- Next message (by thread): [eix-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Policy Proposal (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Sebastien Lahtinen
md at ncuk.net
Tue Oct 26 22:06:53 CEST 2010
On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, Leo Vegoda wrote: >>> - 24/7 NOC >>> - Assigned a unique AS Number >>> - Assigned or allocated address space >>> - Routing policy published in an IRR database > I think I may not have been clear. The requirements I listed above (as > examples only) were the kind of thing I expected exchanges to require of > prospective members. Ah, thanks.. That puts it in somewhat of a different perspective. I'll climb back into my hole :) seb
- Previous message (by thread): [eix-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Policy Proposal (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
- Next message (by thread): [eix-wg] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2010-07 New Policy Proposal (Ambiguity cleanup on IPv6 Address Space Policy for IXP)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]