[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)

On 21/10/2010 14:38, kpn-ip-office at kpn.com wrote:
> I'm in favour of this policy
> 
> Maybe we should change the sentence
> 
> "Cumulatively, no more than 248 additional IPv4 addresses may be
> assigned to any particular End User for the purposes outlined in section
> 6.10."
> 
> Into something like
> 
> "Cumulatively, an PI assignment will not reach beyond the next /24
> boundary from the motivated need. This might thus result in an PI
> assignment of more than one subnet of which each subnet is a minimum of
> a /24".
> 
> (p.e. a /23, /24 when a need of ~ 520 IP-addresses is motivated).

I agree that the wording needs a little work to make the intent clearer,
but I'm not convinced that this particular suggestion is necessarily better.

Nick