[address-policy-wg] 2006-05 New Draft Document Published (PI Assignment Size)

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 14:10, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> If that's not sufficiently clear, we might need to reword.

The wording is clear once you know the intended meaning.
Yet, after reading it twice, I was not certain that I understood
the intent and all consequences of this rule before I read your
explanantion.

IMO, the main problem is that "additional" is ambivalent even though
it's used in the first sentence, as well.

Thus, I would suggest:

The RIPE NCC will assign additional IPv4 addresses to an End User
in order to pad the assignment size to a multiple of a /24 if an End
User demonstrates:

[...]

Cumulatively, no more than 248 padding IPv4 addresses may be
assigned to any particular End User for the purposes outlined in
section 6.10.


Richard