[address-policy-wg] Proposal 2010-02

I don't have an opinion as to whether rationing the last /8 is a good idea, but I do have a comment/question:

It seems that section 2 is a no-op, because the space is not really reserved if it's just returned to the pool when the /8 runs out... Is that the intent?

Scott

On Oct 21, 2010, at 8:35 AM, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote:

> Hello working group,
> 
> The review phase of proposal 2010-02 has ended. During this review phase no comments were received. Without any feedback this proposal can't move forward. I think that it is important that we, as a working group, decide about what we are going to do with the last IPv4 addresses.
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>   http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html
> 
> So: please comment on this proposal.
> 
> Thank you,
> Sander Steffann
> APWG co-chair
>