This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jaap Akkerhuis
jaap at NLnetLabs.nl
Thu Nov 25 14:08:46 CET 2010
So - I can see there is support for "changing the identifiers to help people see where it's coming from", and I think we should leave the details to the nice folks at the RIPE NCC - I've brought it up there, and I'm sure it will be considered thoroughly and a proposal will come up that is a workable compromise of what has been said. Oops, typo coming up. It should of course be "I DO think that .. I don't think that a different naming scheme in document identifiers is a poor substitute for a decent lookup system. What people are actual asking for is a decent way to find RIPE (drafts-) documents. And that by various methods (keyword search, search by workgroup, policy type). One might be better of with something like the IETF <http://tools.ietf.org/html/> or the tools on <http://tools.ietf.org/html/> then a "trick to encode a look up scheme in an identifier". (Thnk DNS versus a Google search). jaap
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]