This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
João Damas
joao at bondis.org
Wed Nov 24 21:59:49 CET 2010
On 24 Nov 2010, at 20:51, Dmitry Burkov wrote: > On 24.11.10 22:38, Remco Van Mook wrote: >>> Well, rip-123 will always be correctly addressed as ripe-123. It's just that ripe- >>> doc-1234 would could be called ripe-1234. I don't see any confusion arising >>> from that and the normal document churn would take care of any potential >>> confusion, anyway. >> The confusion is that, for the next 25 years or so, people will be wondering what the relation is between ripe-<foo> and ripe-doc-<bar> documents. Which one replaces which other one? >> >> So again, please don't. > Agreed, as don't see any real needs and only future problems. +1 Joao
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]