[address-policy-wg] Re: Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 17:01, Remco Van Mook
<Remco.vanMook at eu.equinix.com> wrote:

> I'm more than happy to support your idea for the naming convention of policy proposals.

Thanks :)


> I'll stick to my point of the actual documents however - history does not soft-link. Especially when people are expected to comply (which is the main reason for both protocol and policy to begin with) it's crucial to have a single name attached to it. Eternal confusion arises when you don't.

Well, rip-123 will always be correctly addressed as ripe-123. It's
just that ripe-doc-1234 would could be called ripe-1234. I don't see
any confusion arising from that and the normal document churn would
take care of any potential confusion, anyway.

But again, I don't think there would be any confusion.


RIchard