This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Wed Nov 24 06:44:34 CET 2010
On 24 nov 2010, at 02:31, Jim Reid wrote: > > On 24 Nov 2010, at 01:12, Daniel Roesen wrote: > >> I would suggest the prefix $RIR-PDP-$year-$number, e.g. RIPE-PDP-2010-4711 > > PDP is redundant since your suggested prefix applies to policy proposals. > > I'll bet you're one of these people who says "PIN number" or "IP protocol". :-) You probably want to keep out of the document namespace which is RIPE-<number> already, so putting something in between would be nice. MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]