This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Roesen
dr at cluenet.de
Wed Nov 24 02:12:40 CET 2010
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 02:43:54PM +0000, James Blessing wrote: > How about > > ripe-wg- > > Where WG is replaced with the initial WG short code (so WG in this > list would be ap and the final ref would look like ripe-ap-2010-9999) Where is the added value of encoding a WG in the identifier? The PDP is cross-WG anyway so why introduce semantics in the proposal ID? Especially in the light of proposals touching multiple WG. I would suggest the prefix $RIR-PDP-$year-$number, e.g. RIPE-PDP-2010-4711 PDP for Policy Development Process, a term universally used by all RIRs. Best regards, Daniel -- CLUE-RIPE -- Jabber: dr at cluenet.de -- dr at IRCnet -- PGP: 0xA85C8AA0
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Re: Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]