This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Andy Davidson
andy at nosignal.org
Tue Nov 23 15:31:00 CET 2010
On 22 Nov 2010, at 16:45, David Monosov wrote: > This seems straight forward and reasonable. I'd like to express my support for > this change. Furthermore, my preference is for the ripe-<WG short code> prefix > proposed by James. Will the NCC have to update internal software systems to support this new nomenclature, and if so will it be complex or expensive to implement ? Andy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]