This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Richard Hartmann
richih.mailinglist at gmail.com
Mon Nov 22 17:14:57 CET 2010
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 16:25, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote: > For us, it is :-9 - I'm not sure whether the routing-wg folks are going > to like it... I would argue that the specific WGs would have the final say on anything relating to them (if we end up using WG-specific prefixes), anyway. For example, ripe-rt- would work nicely. > Regarding the specific proposal, I can certainly see why you'd want this, > and if there is enough backing here, I'll bring it up among the WG chairs > and the RIPE NCC to see what can be done about it. Thanks. Would/Should I write a proper proposal for that or would you just take it up directly? Richard PS: Yes, the RIPE is using RT for tickets, but I doubt they would want that namespace for RT.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Unique prefixes for all proposals
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]