[address-policy-wg] Discrepancy Between RIPE Policies on IPv4 and IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Address Space

Hi,

On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 04:58:52PM +0200, Carsten Schiefner wrote:
> Oh, and yes: I am in favour of a v4/v6 harmonisation, too.

Why?

(Half of it is because it's easier to judge the outcome of a discussion
if there are specific arguments for or against something - and the
other half of it is because I'm playing the devil's advocate, and claim
that we might not want IPv6 to be the same as IPv4...  e.g. as in 
"if people can use PI to give single IPv6 addresses to their end 
customers, we might see DSL deployments with single address + NAT,
and this not something I want to see"...)

Gert
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  150584

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279