[address-policy-wg] Easy to remember IP-address

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:06:08PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
> 
> > Masaka, may I suggest you go and post to nanog, or some other place where 
> > IPv6<->IPv4 advocacy is commonplace?
> 
> Do you mean some other place not censored by IPv6 fundamentalists?

This list is here to decide on the rules for handling out numbers to
members of the RIPE NCC and to end users in the RIPE service region
(= "address policy").  Address policy for IPv4 addresses, for IPv6
addresses, and for AS numbers is on-topic - and all discussions that
have direct implications on policy.

It is *NOT* the right place to discuss whether IPv4 or IPv6 is "better".

Feel free to voice anything that you concern relevant to *address policy*
- but the question or not "IPv6 sucks because you don't want to use DNS"
is completely irrelevant to the rules of responsible stewardship for
limited resources.  Which *this* list is about.

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  150584

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 306 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20100331/c0ebfbc5/attachment.sig>