This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Vanity address allocations and the end of IPv4
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Vanity address allocations and the end of IPv4
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Easy to remember IP-address
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at marcoh.net
Mon Mar 29 18:14:16 CEST 2010
> To be clear, we're not talking about anyone getting more or less address > space, or allocating in a way that makes aggregation more difficult. I > thought those were the two basic goals of IP allocation policy, right? But it could lead to a less then optimal address distribution if somebody runs of with a vanity /24, leaving a bunch of smaller blocks for the poor fellow who can justify his /16. MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Vanity address allocations and the end of IPv4
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Easy to remember IP-address
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]