This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): AW: [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Nick Hilliard
nick at inex.ie
Wed Jun 16 21:59:44 CEST 2010
On 16/06/2010 19:37, Max Tulyev wrote: > I think, the policy is fair. > > But you completely forget the Provider Independent assignments there! So > I vote for changing "LIRs" to "Companies" there. This policy is about allocations (i.e. to LIRs), not assignments (i.e. directly to end users). I don't think anyone forgot assignments - they're just outside the scope of the policy. Nick
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): AW: [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]