This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Max Tulyev
president at ukraine.su
Wed Jul 7 15:38:16 CEST 2010
Gennady, for now it is bad. But when there will be a lack of IPv4, we have to sacrifice aggregation in favour to conservation. The difference is the independence. PA is not. Gennady A. написав(ла): > Max, > /29 in the global routing table is a bad thing. > > Those who need multihoming may use PA address space. Now, when > contracts to support address space are necessery, there isn't much > dfference between PI and PA. -- WBR, Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]