[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Draft Document Published (Allocations from the last /8)

Hi All,

I see the policy proposal now deny PI at all. Why?

Those who requsted PI (through us) usually are not so big to become a 
LIR and request /20. They even don't need it. By this proposal, you will 
stimulate small companies become a LIR and get /22 instead of for 
example /24 PI.

For my point of view, there should not be a difference between PA and PI 
distribution in the policy. Better is to make some actions to allow 
de-aggregate prefixes to more than /24. Then those who need /29 will ask 
for /29, not for /24 PI (now) or even /22 PA (if 2010-02 will be in power).

Emilio Madaio написав(ла):
> PDP Number: 2010-02
> Allocations from the last /8
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> The text of the policy proposal 2010-02 has been revised based on the
> community feedback received on the mailing list.
> 
> The draft policy document and the impact analysis for the proposal
> have also been published.
> 
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html
>     
> and the draft document at:
> 
>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-492-draft2010-02.html
> 
> We encourage you to read the draft document text and send any comments
> to address-policy-wg at ripe.net before 4 August.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Emilio Madaio
> Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
> 
> 


-- 
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253 at FIDO)