This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[routing-wg]Re: [address-policy-wg] 32-bit AS Number status?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 32-bit AS Number status?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hank Nussbacher
hank at efes.iucc.ac.il
Sat Jan 30 21:21:54 CET 2010
On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Filiz Yilmaz wrote: > Dear Shane, > > During RIPE 58, Daniel Karrenberg has made a presentation, titled "32-bit ASN > Take-Up Report, Policy Adjustments Needed?". > You can find the presentation at the archives at > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-58/content/presentations/asn32-take-up-report.pdf > > Slide 5 of the presentation relates to your question. The RIPE NCC proposed > that the method of assigning ASNs that was employed in 2009 should continue > after 1 January 2010. This means that all assignments will be for 32-bit only > ASNs by default, unless a 16-bit ASN is specifically requested. The AP WG > agreed with this proposal. Does the RIPE NCC consider a slide in a presentation as proper documentation for revised ASN assignment procedures? -Hank > > You can find the records of this at: > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-58/meeting-report.php > and > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/wg/address-policy/r58-minutes.html > > I hope this helps. > > Kind regards, > > Filiz Yilmaz > Policy Development Manager > RIPE NCC > > > On 28 Jan 2010, at 18:29, Shane Kerr wrote: > >> All, >> >> I noticed that the proposed updated AS Number policy was sent to the >> address-policy-wg recently. >> >> There is a timeline for 32-bit AS Number in both the old and new >> versions, which says: >> >> "From 1 January 2010 the RIPE NCC will cease to make any distinction >> between 16-bit AS Numbers and 32-bit only AS Numbers, and will operate >> AS Number assignments from an undifferentiated 32-bit AS Number >> allocation pool." >> >> I'm not sure exactly what this means, but I think it is supposed to mean >> that people get 32-bit AS Numbers now. Did this happen? >> >> If it didn't, why not? Do we need to change "2010" to "2011"? Is it ever >> going to happen? >> >> If it did, was there any effect? I mean both from humans (angry LIRs, >> peasants marching on the castle with torches, riots in the streets), or >> on the Intertubes (ugly routing artifacts, mass reboots of boxes with >> old firmware, monitoring systems gone wild)? >> >> Just wondering. :) >> >> -- >> Shane >> >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 32-bit AS Number status?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]