This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] RE: address-policy-wg digest, Vol 1 #1183 - 6 msgs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: new revised document for Autonomous System (AS) Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Milton L Mueller
mueller at syr.edu
Tue Aug 31 16:50:10 CEST 2010
I would advise everyone to be very careful about allowing an organization to arbitrarily define something as "implementation" or "management practice" rather than "policy," especially when such a unilateral redefinition allows important processes and public input to be bypassed. --MM > -----Original Message----- > > Geoff Huston's report states that: "At the time IANA reaches the last > > 5 /8s (the "IANA Exhaustion time" as defined by current address > > allocation policies), these unassigned addresses in the legacy /8s are > > then distributed evenly to the RIRs." I am not sure where this > > information came from though, since this is not spelled out in the > > "Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space" policy > > (http://www.icann.org/en/general/allocation-remaining-ipv4-space.htm) > > as far as I can discern. > > This is presumably an address management practice agreed by the NRO > rather than a matter of policy. > > Regards, > > Leo Vegoda= > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Cosmetic Surgery Project: new revised document for Autonomous System (AS) Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]