This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tore Anderson
tore.anderson at redpill-linpro.com
Mon Aug 30 20:49:20 CEST 2010
Hi Chris, * Chris Grundemann > It is a pull model with equal distribution. The key term in the > first statement is "*eligible* RIRs." If three RIRs have exhausted > their IPv4 address space, they all make that announcement and the > subsequent request to the IANA. They then all receive one third of the > Reclamation Pool (divided on CIDR boundaries). I see. So, what exactly prevents something like this from happening: Day 1: 0 RIRs eligible, 125.4M addresses in RP Day 2: RIR «Red» depletes its inventory, now only RIR eligible for RP Day 3: RIR «Red» requests and receives its 125.4M/1 share of the RP Day 4: RIR «Blue» depletes its inventory, but can't receive anything from the now-empty RP. Repeat for remaining three RIRs. Best regards, -- Tore Anderson Redpill Linpro AS - http://www.redpill-linpro.com/ Tel: +47 21 54 41 27
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-05 New Policy Proposal (Global Policy for IPv4 Allocation by the IANA post exhaustion)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]