This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 Review Period has ended (Allocations from the last /8)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 Review Period has ended (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: Autonomous System (AS) Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Emilio Madaio
emadaio at ripe.net
Wed Aug 4 16:30:09 CEST 2010
Dear Colleagues, The mail you received earlier today on the address-policy-wg mailing list entitled "2010-02 Review Period has ended (Allocations from the last /8)" was sent in error. Please disregard that email. Apologies for any inconvenience. Regards, Emilio Madaio On 8/4/10 4:03 PM, Emilio Madaio wrote: > Dear Gert and Sander, > > The review period for the new RIPE Document described in proposal > 2010-02 has ended. > > > You can find the full proposal at: > > http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2010-02.html > > > > Please reply to this email to let us know how you would like to proceed. > > * Do you want to move the proposal to "Last Call"? The Last Call > period is four weeks. > > * Do you want us to edit the draft document text? Please tell us the > details that you want us to edit. > > * Do you want to extend the review period? Please let us know what > date you wish to extend it to, and we will tell the RIPE community. > > * Do you want to withdraw this proposal? > > Please let us know your decision in the next seven days. > > Below a brief summary of the discussion in the Review Phase. Some > observations were made on some points of the new proposal draft and on > the possible consequences to the proposal implementation: > > -there should be a need to mention how the PI space will be handled > (Tulyev, Davidson, Kuenzler); > > -it may be prudent to implement the policy on the last /8 contiguous > block from IANA, rather than the potential fragmented last available > /8 in the NCC address pool(Anderson); > > -possible situations when an LIR cannot justify an immediate need for > a /22 (Anderson) and therefore a suggestion to allow extra /22 > assignment overtime (Schliesser); > > -impossibility to assign Anycast address(Tulyev). > > > The archived discussion is available at > > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2010/index-thread.html > > We look forward to your response. > > Kind Regards > > Emilio Madaio > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 Review Period has ended (Allocations from the last /8)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] New Draft Document: Autonomous System (AS) Number Assignment Policies
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]