This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] what to do about 2009-01?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what to do about 2009-01?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what to do about 2009-01?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Wed Apr 14 14:03:43 CEST 2010
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:14:38PM +0100, Jim Reid wrote: > 1) Withdraw 2009-01. It's dead. Heroic measures to revive it and > achieve a global policy are not going to have a happy outcome. So > accept that situation and give up. sounds reasonable, but it has the downside of not making an assessment of the merits of the proposal as well as delivering the second bullet. > 2) Continue with 2009-01 with a view to aligning things with the other > RIRs except ARIN. Perhaps that might persuade ARIN to reconsider. It's It's always easy to approve of something that you know doesn't come into effect. So, if the community really wants this option, we better assume it be implemented sooner or later _and_ emphasize the commitment by appropriate communication outside the PDP process. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what to do about 2009-01?
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what to do about 2009-01?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]