This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] what to do about 2009-01?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The emacs, X windows and Linux approach to policy making
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what to do about 2009-01?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Wed Apr 14 13:14:38 CEST 2010
Michael, I was hoping we could reduce the number of options to consider for 2009-01, not add to them. Oh well... So how about just having these two possibilities: 1) Withdraw 2009-01. It's dead. Heroic measures to revive it and achieve a global policy are not going to have a happy outcome. So accept that situation and give up. 2) Continue with 2009-01 with a view to aligning things with the other RIRs except ARIN. Perhaps that might persuade ARIN to reconsider. It's also good PR because we're committing to making recovered space available for the greater good, even if that recovered space will probably just exist as an abstract concept. Does anyone here have a spare /8 to hand over?
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] The emacs, X windows and Linux approach to policy making
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] what to do about 2009-01?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]