This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Apr 1 15:31:07 CEST 2010
On 1 Apr 2010, at 14:17, Marcus Stoegbauer wrote: > Since network operators cannot remember what they had for breakfast or > which shoe fits on which foot, let alone numbers larger than 10, > revoking all IPv4 allocations and assignments would create confusion > and > hurting brains at LIRs all over Europe and Japan because network > operators would need to learn new numbers. Why would that be a problem? There's another thread on this list which suggests there's a need for a policy about allocating easy to remember numbers. This will dovetail rather well with Nick's proposal.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2010-02 New Policy Proposal (Revoke and Re-assign Fairly)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]